- Solved Files Newsletter
- Posts
- The Clerk Who Wanted a Book Deal Just Freed a Convicted Killer
The Clerk Who Wanted a Book Deal Just Freed a Convicted Killer
This Week’s Most Gripping True Crime Stories You Can't Miss
It's Monday. Every department already has context. Nobody prepped anything.
Your CFO opens Slack. There's a weekly Stripe revenue recap in #finance with a churned-accounts flag and a net-new breakdown. She didn't ask for it.
Your head of product opens Slack. There's a GitHub summary in private channel: PRs merged, PRs stale, Linear tickets that moved. He didn't ask for it.
Your marketing lead opens Slack. There's a Google Ads performance comparison in private channel, with a note: "Meta CPA crept up 18% this week. Might be worth pausing the broad match campaign." She didn't ask for it either.
All-hands at 10am. Everyone already knows the numbers. The meeting is about decisions, not catch-up.
That's what happens when one colleague works across every tool your company uses. Not one department's assistant. The whole company's coworker.
Viktor lives in Slack. Top 5 on Product Hunt, 130 comments. SOC 2 certified. Your data never trains models.
"Not only have we caught up on several months of work, we are automating manual tasks and expanding our operations to things previously not possible at scale." - Jesse Guarino, Director, Torque King 4x4
10K Steps Is a Myth–Try This Instead
When motivation is lacking, jumping into heavy routines is the fastest way to burn out. That’s why millions of people are turning to walking as the foundation of their fitness journey.
Walking lets you enjoy the outdoors, clear your head, and practice mindfulness. It’s simple, sustainable, and can support lasting weight loss if you know how much you need. The “10,000 steps a day” rule is outdated; everyone’s lifestyle is different.
With Simple, you’ll get access to habit-based coaching that’s helped users lose over 18 million pounds. Take the quiz to discover your personalized walking target.
👋 Welcome Back, Case Crackers
Three years ago, a South Carolina jury convicted Alex Murdaugh of murdering his wife and son in less than three hours. The world watched. The verdict felt final. Yesterday, the South Carolina Supreme Court threw it out. All five justices. Unanimous. The reason: the court clerk assigned to oversee the jury had been whispering to jurors not to trust Murdaugh's testimony, while writing a book about the case. This isn't a story about whether Murdaugh is guilty. It's a story about what happens when the system that's supposed to deliver justice becomes corrupt itself. Grab your notebook. This one is complicated, and every detail matters.
🔎 Full Case Story — What We Know

Alex Murdaugh in custody after his conviction for the murders of his wife and son
On the evening of June 7, 2021, Alex Murdaugh called 911 to report finding the bodies of his wife, Maggie, and his 22-year-old son, Paul, outside their Colleton County estate in Islandton, South Carolina. Both had been shot. Murdaugh, a prominent attorney from a South Carolina Lowcountry legal dynasty, was convicted by a jury of the murders of his wife, Maggie, and 22-year-old son, Paul, in March 2023.
The trial gripped the nation. Murdaugh admits to being a thief, a liar, an insurance cheat, a drug addict and a bad lawyer. But even from behind bars he has adamantly denied he is a killer. The jury disagreed. After less than three hours of deliberation, they found him guilty on all counts. He was sentenced to two consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole.
That should have been the end of it. It wasn't.
Murdaugh's appeal focused on allegedly inappropriate comments to jurors from Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill, who worked during Murdaugh's trial and later wrote a tell-all book about it. Hill hoped to improve sales of a book she was writing about the case. The name of the book was "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders." It was pulled from publication after plagiarism allegations were made.
In a unanimous ruling Wednesday, the South Carolina Supreme Court said Hill's conduct "egregiously attacked Murdaugh's credibility" by suggesting to jurors his testimony could not be trusted. "Hill placed her fingers on the scales of justice," the court wrote in its unanimous decision.
The justices also ruled the trial judge went too far in allowing evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes into his murder trial.
Murdaugh's attorney, Dick Harpootlian, said in a statement: "The Supreme Court's decision today affirms that the rule of law remains strong in South Carolina. The Court found that Becky Hill's conduct during the trial attacked Alex Murdaugh's credibility and his defense."
South Carolina's attorney general said he "respectfully" disagreed with the court's decision and vowed to "aggressively seek to retry" Murdaugh "as soon as possible." "No one is above the law and, as always, we will continue to fight for justice," Alan Wilson said.
Murdaugh won't be getting out of prison. The 57-year-old pleaded guilty to stealing around $12 million from his clients and is currently serving a 40-year federal sentence. The murder conviction is gone, the man is still behind bars.
🔔 Breaking News — Latest Developments
Wilson told reporters his "hope is to get this case retried by the end of the year," but noted the window is still open for his team to ask the South Carolina Supreme Court to reconsider its decision or to appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill pleaded guilty to criminal charges for showing sealed court exhibits to a photographer and lying about it in court. She has already faced legal consequences for her conduct, but the damage she caused to the Murdaugh prosecution is now fully documented in a unanimous Supreme Court ruling.
Maggie and Paul Murdaugh's family — the victims at the center of this case, have not yet publicly responded to the ruling. Their path to justice has just been reset to zero.
🕊 Victim Voices — Remembering Their Lives

Paul, Margaret "Maggie" and Alex Murdaugh.
Maggie Murdaugh, 52 — She was shot multiple times outside the family's hunting estate on a June evening in 2021. By all accounts she was a devoted mother, deeply involved in her sons' lives and her community. She was 52 years old. Her death set off one of the most sprawling true crime sagas in recent American history, but she deserves to be remembered as a person, not a plot point.
Paul Murdaugh, 22 — The younger of Alex and Maggie's two sons, Paul was a recent college graduate whose own legal troubles had brought scrutiny to the Murdaugh family before the murders. Whatever his complications, he was 22 years old and he was killed on his family's property. His mother died the same night. He deserves more than a footnote in his father's legal saga.
Both Maggie and Paul were killed in June 2021. As of May 15, 2026, no one has been convicted of their murders.

🩺 Tip of the Week - "When the System Itself Fails"
The Murdaugh case is a reminder that a conviction is only as solid as the process that produced it. Here is what this ruling teaches:
Court officials are not neutral observers. Clerks, bailiffs, and court staff have direct access to jurors. That access is supposed to be tightly controlled. When it isn't — when a clerk whispers suggestions to jurors about credibility, it poisons the entire proceeding.
Financial motive corrupts. Becky Hill was writing a book about the case while managing the jury. That conflict of interest went undetected until after the conviction. If you ever serve on a jury and a court official makes unsolicited comments about the case or the defendant, report it to the judge immediately.
Appeals exist for a reason. Many people view criminal appeals as legal tricks used to free guilty people. Sometimes they are. But in this case, the appeals process caught genuine misconduct, misconduct that the original trial judge did not detect. The system, slow and imperfect as it is, eventually worked.
A retrial is not an acquittal. Murdaugh has not been found innocent. His murder conviction has been thrown out on procedural grounds. He remains in prison. A retrial could result in a second conviction. The presumption of innocence applies again, but so does the prosecution's evidence.
Victims' families carry the cost. Every time a high-profile case returns to square one, the families of the victims are asked to live through it again. That cost is rarely discussed when legal victories are celebrated.

🧩 Case Crackers — The Murdaugh Cipher
How to play: Use numbers from the case to decode each letter (1=A, 2=B… 26=Z), then arrange them in clue order to reveal the hidden word.
Clue 1: How many justices voted to overturn the conviction?
Clue 2: How many people were murdered at the Murdaugh estate in June 2021?
Clue 3: How many years passed between the murders and the conviction being overturned?
Convert each number to its corresponding letter, then arrange them in clue order to form your code.
🕵 Truth Check — Myths vs. Facts
Myths | Facts |
If a conviction is overturned, the defendant goes free. | Overturning a conviction orders a new trial, it does not release the defendant or find them innocent. Murdaugh remains in prison on a separate 40-year sentence. A retrial could result in a second conviction. |
A unanimous jury verdict is impossible to overturn. | The strength of a verdict is irrelevant if the process that produced it was tainted. Jury unanimity reflects agreement among jurors, not that those jurors were uninfluenced. The court found they were influenced, and that finding overrides the verdict. |
Court clerks are neutral and have no influence over jury decisions. | Clerks have direct access to jurors and in some jurisdictions manage jury logistics throughout a trial. That access, when abused, can directly contaminate a verdict. The South Carolina Supreme Court found exactly that here. |
⚖ Courtroom Corner — What "Overturned" Actually Means
What the ruling does and doesn't do: Overturning a conviction does not mean the defendant is innocent. It means the trial was legally flawed in a way that cannot be overlooked. The South Carolina Supreme Court found that Hill's interference denied Murdaugh his constitutional right to a fair trial by an impartial jury. That is a procedural violation — not a finding of innocence.
Why the financial crimes evidence mattered: The justices ruled the trial judge went too far in allowing evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes into his murder trial. Under evidence law, prior bad acts can be admitted to show motive or intent, but the line is narrow. The court found it was crossed here, giving prosecutors an unfair advantage by prejudicing the jury against Murdaugh before they even weighed the murder evidence.
What happens at a retrial: Murdaugh will be tried again on two counts of murder. Prosecutors will present their case without the financial crimes evidence the Supreme Court found improperly admitted. The jury will be a new one, with no knowledge of the previous conviction. Becky Hill will not be involved.
Where Murdaugh stands now: Murdaugh is currently serving a 40-year federal sentence for stealing around $12 million from his clients. He will remain incarcerated regardless of what happens in the retrial. The stakes of the retrial are significant: two life sentences, but he is not walking free either way.
From The Archives — When Justice Takes a Wrong Turn
This week's case is not the first time this newsletter has covered a legal outcome that left everyone unsatisfied.
A Mother Hired Hitmen to Kill Her Son-In-Law— In September 2025, a Florida jury convicted Donna Adelson of orchestrating a murder-for-hire plot against her own son-in-law, Dan Markel. The case took eleven years, five trials, and an airport arrest to close. The system moved slowly — but it moved.
He Delivered Her Christmas Present. Then He Took Her. — Last week, a Texas jury sentenced FedEx driver Tanner Horner to death for the kidnapping and murder of seven-year-old Athena Strand. The jury deliberated less than three hours. In this week's case, a different jury also deliberated less than three hours, and their verdict just got thrown out. The difference between justice and injustice can come down to what a court clerk says in a hallway.

🗣 Have Your Say – Help Shape the Next Solved Files
We love hearing from our Case Crackers community, your ideas and feedback keep our investigations sharp and our stories gripping.
This week, we’re asking:
Which cases or true crime topics do you want us to tackle next?
Do you like the mix of features we include, or is something missing?
Would you enjoy more behind-the-scenes looks, expert interviews, or interactive challenges?
💡 Your thoughts matter — fill out our quick feedback form HERE and you might just see your suggestion featured in an upcoming edition.
Together, we’ll uncover the stories that matter most.

🔦 🔒 Step Inside the Evidence Vault
Every week in this newsletter, you get the key facts of each case. But there’s a side of true crime we can’t show here: raw photos, full reports, and uncensored evidence too sensitive for public release.
That’s why we built a private space for our most dedicated Case Crackers, on Patreon.
When you join, you’ll unlock:
📂 Exclusive crime scene and evidence photos — the same images investigators analyzed, including rare suspect and victim visuals.
🎥 Uncensored interrogation and footage access — the clips too intense or restricted to post publicly.
🕵 Behind-the-scenes breakdowns — discover how real detectives piece together motive, timeline, and truth.
💬 Community discussions — join other true crime enthusiasts to debate theories, spot clues, and share insights.
Here’s a small preview of what’s waiting inside:
![]() Exclusive suspect image — full case file available only on Patreon | ![]() Exclusive evidence photo — complete collection inside the vault |
And that’s just the beginning. Patreon members get full access to complete photo sets, classified-level case notes, and uncut footage that brings every investigation to life.
👉 Join Solved Files on Patreon today and step inside the vault of unfiltered true crime.
📲 Follow Us Everywhere
Want daily updates and quick case clues? Find us here:
TikTok & Instagram: Crime polls, case clues, and behind-the-scenes breakdowns.
Solved Files Shorts: The biggest shocks in under a minute, moments that prove the smallest details can crack a case wide open.
💡 Thanks for following along this week. Every investigation is another puzzle piece, and together, we’re piecing the truth into focus. Stay sharp, stay curious, and remember: the next clue is always closer than you think.




